| 442 | 67 | 35 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
研究表明 ,扬子陆块早奥陶世末期至中奥陶世 Darriwilian初期各类沉积呈明显带状分布 ,但南北两侧沉积带分布并不对称。各沉积带总体走向为南西—北东向 ,不同阶段沉积带类型及位置略有变化。自古陆向东南方向 ,早奥陶世末期—中奥陶世初期依次发育近岸砂砾质沉积带 ,近岸砂质、泥质沉积带 ;内陆架泥质夹碳酸盐沉积带 ;浅外陆架碳酸盐夹泥质沉积带 ,含铁泥质碳酸盐沉积带 ,边缘碳酸盐沉积带 ;深外陆架斜坡泥质夹砂质、碳酸盐沉积带 ,泥质夹粉砂质沉积带 ,泥质、碳质沉积带。中奥陶世早期至 Darriwilian初期演变为近岸白云质与陆源碎屑沉积带 ;内陆架碳酸盐与泥、砂质沉积带 ;浅外陆架碳酸盐夹泥质沉积带 ,含铁泥质碳酸盐沉积带 ,边缘碳酸盐沉积带 ;深外陆架斜坡泥质夹砂质、碳酸盐沉积带 ,泥质夹粉砂质沉积带 ,泥质、碳质沉积带。扬子陆块北缘早奥陶世末期—中奥陶世初期发育浅外陆架粉砂质、泥质、碳酸盐沉积带 ,边缘碳酸盐沉积带 ;中奥陶世早期至 Darriwilian初期则包括浅外陆架碳酸盐沉积带 ,粉砂质、泥质 ,外陆架碳酸盐沉积带 ,边缘碳酸盐沉积带
Abstract：Based on new chronostratigraphic framework and revised stratigraphic correlation(Table 1), the present paper deals with the sedimentary differentiation of latest Early Ordovician—earliest Darriwilian in the Yangtze Block. According to rock associations and sedimentary features, 9 sedimentary belts are recognized from the old lands southeastward toward the basin during the latest Early—earliest Middle Ordovician (Fig.1), namely: nearshore sand and gravel belt, nearshore sand and mud belt; inner shelf mud carbonate belt; shallower outer shelf carbonate mud belt, ferruginous and argillaceous carbonate belt, marginal carbonate belt; daeper outer shelf mud sand carbonate belt, mud silt belt and argillite carbonaceous shale belt. During the early Middle Ordovician—earliest Darriwilian, most of the sedimentary belts (Fig.2) developed formerly on the outer shelf and the slope remained their geographical positions. However, there were two, instead of three, sedimentary belts occurred in shallow sites; the inner shelf one is characterized by the dominance of carbonate sediments mixed with argillaceous and sandy intercalations. In addition, dolomitic deposits and terrigenous detrital sediments became dominant in the nearshore region. On the northern side of the Yangtze Block proper, three sedimentary belts can be recognized especially during the early Middle Ordovician—earliest Darriwilian. The shallower outer shelf carbonates outcrop only at Hexian, Anhui; the outershelf argillaceous, silty, and carbonate sediments were mainly developed at Mianxian and Susong; the marginal carbonate belt extends approximately from Chuxian to Hongze. It is interesting to note that deeper water sedimentary belts are only incompletely preserved on the northerm side, and a plausible explanation is that they were partially consumed by the later tectonic movements. The distribution pattern of sedimentary belts on the either side of the Yangtze Block is asymmetrical. The south side is thought to be a gentle slope, and the northern side could be a steeper, narrower shelf. Because the Ordovician is largely covered by the Quaternary in the Lower Yangtze area and only a little detailed stratigraphic information is available so far, the extending of the sedimentary belts in this area is just tentatively suggested. Further work is required to connect the corresponding sedimentary belts between the Lowere Yangtze area and the Middle and Upper Yangtze area.
1胡荣民.1976.云南的奥陶系.云南省地质科学研究所印.1—266.
1中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所西南队奥陶系组.1977.西南地区奥陶系基础剖面的论述.地层古生物,8:39—91
2胡荣民.1976.云南的奥陶系.云南省地质科学研究所印.1—266.
3张文堂,许汉奎,陈 旭,陈均远,袁克兴,林尧坤,王俊庚.1964.贵州北部的奥陶系.见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所编,贵州北部的古生代地层.33—78.
1张全忠,焦世鼎,唐毅.1991.下扬子海盆奥陶纪沉积相生物标志.地质矿产部南京地质矿产研究所科研报告.1—70
2胡荣民.1976.云南的奥陶系.云南省地质科学研究所印.1—266.
3中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所西南队奥陶系组.1977.西南地区奥陶系基础剖面的论述.地层古生物,8:39—91
1张文堂,许汉奎,陈 旭,陈均远,袁克兴,林尧坤,王俊庚.1964.贵州北部的奥陶系.见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所编.贵州北部的古生代地层.33—78
2张全忠,焦世鼎,唐毅.1991.下扬子海盆奥陶纪沉积相生物标志.地质矿产部南京地质矿产研究所科研报告.1—70
1中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所西南队奥陶系组.1977.西南地区奥陶系基础剖面的论述.地层古生物,8:39—91
2张全忠,焦世鼎,唐毅.1991.下扬子海盆奥陶纪沉积相生物标志.地质矿产部南京地质矿产研究所科研报告.1—70.
1湖南省地质矿产局区调队六分队.1986.湖南地层.151—227.
2中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所西南队奥陶系组.1977.西南地区奥陶系基础剖面的论述.地层古生物,8:39—91.
中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所.1974.西南地区地层古生物手册.北京:科学出版社.23—31.
中南地区区域地层表编写小组.1974.中南地区区域地层表.北京:地质出版社.101—319.
云南省地质矿产局.1990.云南省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社.84—85.
王志浩,BergstromS M.1999.华南奥陶系达瑞威尔阶底界附近的牙形刺.微体古生物学报,16(4):325—350.
四川省区域地层表编写组.1978.西南地区区域地层表 四川省分册.北京:地质出版社.1—438.
四川省地质矿产局.1997.四川省岩石地层.武汉:中国地质大学出版社.51—114.
卢衍豪,朱兆玲,钱义元,周志毅,陈均远,刘耕武,余 汶,陈 旭,许汉奎.1976.中国奥陶纪的生物地层和古动物地理.中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所集刊,7:1—83.
江西省地质矿产局.1984.江西省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社.68—107
安太庠.1987.中国南部早古生代牙形石.北京:北京大学出版社.1—238.
安徽省地质矿产局区域地质调查队(齐敦伦执笔).1989.安徽地层志 奥陶系分册.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社.1—234.
成汉钧,汪明洲,陈祥荣,许安东,陈淑娥.1988.大巴山奥陶系的研究.西安地质学院学报.10(1):1—13.
刘永耀,孙振华,杨少铭.1984.鄂东南过渡类型的寒武奥陶纪地层.地层学杂志,8(2):94—106.
任纪舜,姜春发,张正坤,秦德余.1980.中国大地构造及其演化.北京:科学出版社.1—122.
任纪舜,肖黎薇.2001.中国大地构造与地层区划.地层学杂志,25(增刊):316—369.
许效松,徐 强,潘桂棠,刘巧红,范影年,何原相.1996.中国南大陆演化与全球古地理对比.北京:地质出版社.1—161.齐敦伦,杜森官.1981.安徽无为、含山一带的奥陶系.地层学杂志,5(1):20—27.
李晋僧,曹宣铎,杨家,殷鸿福,杨逢清,张瑞林,胡云绪,赖旭龙.1994.秦岭显生宙古海盆沉积和演化史.北京:地质出版社.1—202.
李耀西,宋礼生,周志强,杨景尧等编.1975.大巴山西段早古生代地层志.北京:地质出版社.62—84.
张文堂,李积金,葛梅钰,陈均远.1982.中国奥陶系的划分及对比——中国奥陶纪地层对比表及说明书.见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所编.中国各纪地层对比表及说明书.北京:科学出版社.55—72.
张汉金.2000.湖北早古生代古地理基本模式.见:第三届全国地层会议论文集.北京:地质出版社.102—106.
邹西平.1987.浙江余杭、临安奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石.中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊,12:231—295.
陈 旭,邹西平,杨达铨.1981.浙北临安、余杭下奥陶统岩相、生物相变化的新观察.地震地质,(2):48.
陈 旭,陈挺恩,邹西平,邱金玉,倪寓南,杨学长.1988.江苏下扬子地区的奥陶系.见:江苏石油勘探局地质科学研究院,南京地质古生物研究所著.江苏地区下扬子准地台震旦纪—三叠纪生物地层.南京:南京大学出版社.81—121.
陈 旭,周志毅,戎嘉余,李军.2000.奥陶系.见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所编.中国地层研究二十年(1979-1999).合肥:中国科技大学出版社.39—58.
陈华成,吴其切等.1989.长江中下游地层志.合肥:安徽科技出版社.61—157.
杜森官,王莉莉.1980.安徽石台六都地区的奥陶系.地层学杂志,4(2):120—128.
周名魁,王汝植,李志明,袁鄂荣,何原相,杨家,胡昌铭,熊代全,楼雄英.1993.中国南方奥陶—志留纪岩相古地理与成矿作用.北京:地质出版社.1—110.
贵州省地层古生物工作队.1977.西南地区区域地层表 贵州省分册.北京:地质出版社.1—520.
段金英.1985.江苏东台廉贻地区大湾组动物群的发现及其意义.地层学杂志,9(2):119—124.
浙江省区域地层表编写组.1979.华东地区区域地层表 浙江省分册.北京:地质出版社.1—161.
曾庆銮,赖才根,徐光洪,倪世钊,周天梅,项礼文,汪啸风,李志宏.1987.奥陶系.见:汪啸风等.长江三峡地区生物地层学 (2)早古生代分册.北京:地质出版社.43—70.
湖北省地质矿产局.1996.湖北省岩石地层.武汉:中国地质大学出版社.57—139.
湖南省地质矿产局.1988.湖南省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社.62—65.
赖才根,汪啸风,傅 锟,安太庠,易庸恩,林宝玉,邱洪荣,杨敬之,张文堂,刘第墉,陈挺恩.1982.中国的奥陶系.北京:地质出版社.1—297.
赖才根,金若谷,林宝玉,黄枝高.1993.下扬子地区奥陶纪生物相、沉积相及古地理特征.北京:地质出版社.1—83.
赖才根,黄枝高,方晓思,邱洪容,毛毓华.1990.陕南川北奥陶系再研究.地层古生物论文集,23:1—36.
鞠天吟.1979.对苏杭地区早古生代地层的认识(苏杭扬子—江南型沉积过渡区的特征).地层学杂志,3(4):294—304.
穆恩之,朱兆玲,陈均远,戎嘉余.1979.西南地区的奥陶系.见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所著.西南地区碳酸盐生物地层.北京:科学出版社.108—154.
ChenXu&BergstromS M.1995.The base of the austrodentatuszone as a level for global subdivision of theOrdovicianSystem.Palaeoworld,5:1—115.
CooperR A.1999.TheOrdovician time scale-calibration of grapto-lite and conodontzones.ActaUniversitatisCarolinae-Geologica,43(1/2):1—4.
ReadingH G.1986.Sedimentary environmem nts and facies.Ox-ford:BlackwellScientificPublications.1—615.TurveyS T &ZhouZhi-yi.2002.Arenig trilobite associations ofDaping,Yichang,Hubei,SouthChina.ActaPalaeontologicaSinica,41(1):10—18.
WilsonJ L.1975.Carbonate facies in geological history.Berlin:Springer-Verlag.1—471.
ZhangJian-hua.1998.Conodonts from theGuniutanFormation(L lanvirnian) inHubei andHunanProvinces,south-centralChina.ActaUniversitatisStockholmiensis,StockholmContri-butions inGeology,46:1—161.
ZhouZhi-yi,DeanW T,&L uoHui-lin.1998.EarlyOrdoviciantrilobites fromDali,WestYunnan,China,and their palaeogeo-graphical significance.Palaeontology,41(3):429—460
基本信息:
中图分类号:P534.42
引用信息:
[1]张允白,周志毅,张俊明.扬子陆块早奥陶世末期—中奥陶世Darriwilian初期沉积分异[J].地层学杂志,2002(04):302-314.
基金信息:
国家基金委特殊学科人才培养基金;; 南京地质古生物研究所创新基金;; 中国科学院古生物与古人类学科基础研究特别支持费(980 3 0 3 );; 国家自然科学基金 (No.49772 0 87、No.49872 0 0 5、No.4990 2 0 0 1);; 国家重点基础研究专项经费 (G2 0 0 0 0 7770 0 )资助
2002-12-30
2002-12-30